|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 4:47:17 GMT -5
that was what the other post you didnt understand was saying basicly
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 18:56:53 GMT -5
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy. I am totally lost and now I will fall into the never ending pit of lostness.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 19:51:02 GMT -5
yay lostness!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 19:56:39 GMT -5
Where am I?
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:11:14 GMT -5
in lost
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 20:15:03 GMT -5
Where's that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:20:21 GMT -5
IN lost
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 20:24:58 GMT -5
And where's LOST.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:26:56 GMT -5
not if found
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 20:27:24 GMT -5
Huh??
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:30:17 GMT -5
lost wont be found in somplace that is found cus it wouldnt be lost now whould it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 20:30:51 GMT -5
I know but your reply made no sense,
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:33:34 GMT -5
well being in lost makes no sence either cus i know about it and you found it also so how is it in lost?  |
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 20:42:40 GMT -5
But you said lost was in not if found.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 11, 2005 20:44:01 GMT -5
but that would be impossible so i was giveing you false information.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 11, 2005 23:36:31 GMT -5
No it's just grammatically doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 12, 2005 4:53:11 GMT -5
or is it
|
|
|
|
Post by iamtheprodigy on Oct 12, 2005 15:56:33 GMT -5
*ears asplode*
|
|
|
|
Post by Arcum on Oct 12, 2005 17:43:40 GMT -5
WTF is asplode? did you mean explode?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kratos on Oct 12, 2005 19:14:56 GMT -5
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't...
|
|
